ME3910/4000/4010 PmWiki (Senior Capstone Design)
SearchWiki
  • ME 4000 Homepage

ERSB

  • TEAM NEWS
  • Customer Requirements
  • Functional Specifications
  • Benchmarking
  • Brainstorming
  • Prototypes
  • Group Presentations
  • Team Reports
    • Final Report
    • ERSB Proposal
  • Individual Reports
    • Michael Allen Report
    • Blake Anderson Report
    • David Call Report
    • Gavin Mehraban Report
    • Matthew Sartori Report
    • Michael Weidner Report
    • Jason Wendel Report
  • Progress Memos
  • Schedule

Team Members

  • Michael Allen
  • Blake Anderson
  • David Call
  • Gavin Mehraban
  • Matthew Sartori
  • Michael Weidner
  • Jason Wendel

(edit side bar)

(↓)

ME4000 Links

14 users logged in

(edit side bar)

Projects

  • ÜberBoard
  • Downhill Wheelchair
  • Titan-40w
  • Electronic Valve Control
  • Snowboard Release Binding
  • Electric Skateboard
  • Formula SAE
  • Lower Limb Modeling
  • Mini Baja
  • Moon Buggy
  • SMA Array Controls
  • Robot Hand Mechanics
  • Solar Car
  • Tornado Machine
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
  • Wind Turbine

Course Info

  • Student WikiPages
  • Senior Design Students Page
  • Senior Design Projects Page
  • ME4000 Documents
  • Syllabus
  • Grades
    • PotOfGold Questionaire
  • Project Fundraising

Assignments

  • Labs
    • Pro E FAQ
  • Homework
  • Presentations
  • Memos
    • Deliverables Memo
    • SRR Memo
  • GroupFinalReport
    • Section 2
    • Section 3
    • Section 4
  • Inidividual Wiki Report
    • Wiki Report Template
  • Main/LatePolicy

Resources

  • Useful Software
  • Sample SideBar
  • Will’s Wiki Tips
 
 

ME 3910 links

  • Student WikiPages
(part 1 of your homework)
  • Senior Design Students Page
(part 2 of your homework)
  • ME 3910 Class Website
  • PmWiki Philosophy
  • PmWiki Text Formatting Rules
  • PmWiki Basic Editing
  • Edit Quick Reference
  • Will’s PmWiki tips

Capstone Homepage

  • Capstone 05

Last year’s ME 4000 links

  • Anouncements
  • Grades
  • Class Schedule
  • Individual Final Report
  • Group Final Report
  • Update Presentation Info
    • Presenation Grading
    • Presentation Feedback
    • Andy’s Midterm Feedback
  • ProE Info
  • LatePolicy
  • General Class Handouts
  • ME 4000 Class Website
(not as reliable as wiki)
  • Will’s PmWiki tips
  • ProjectFundraising

PmWiki

  • PmWikiPhilosophy
  • TextFormattingRules
  • BasicEditing
  • EditQuickReference
  • Tips For Editing?
  • Documentation Index
  • FAQ

(edit side bar)

pmwiki.org

  • Cookbook
  • PITS (bugs, development)
  • PmWikiUsers

(edit side bar)

ERSB/
Jason Wendel Report
                                                Login
Read PageEdit PagePage AttributesPage HistoryUploadLogin Page
Printable View

Summary Page for Individual Report

Date: (28 Nov 2006)

Table of Contents

Report Summary Page

  • Problem Statement
  • Summary of Approach
  • Summary of Results
  • Lessons Learned
Author: Jason WendelTeam: ERSB

Problem Statement

The challenge for the Emergency Release Snowboard Bindings team (ERSB) is that nothing like this has been created before. There are many different ways to attack the problem of creating a design that will quickly release to give the boarder a better chance of survival in the advent of an avalanche. One of the main problems is that the device must work in extreme temperatures and environments. It will most likely get snow jammed up inside it and get frozen in place so this had to be taken into consideration while designing the product. Each team member chose a particular type of design to explore, and evaluate for effectiveness. The type that I chose involved the use of one or multiple plates or rings that spin to stick out tabs or dowels that hold the binding in place.

Summary of Approach

It was decided that one possible configuration would be to have multiple plates or rings that allow the binding to detach by spinning one in relation to the other. Some designs were created that fit in this category that demonstrated the effectiveness of this idea. The manufacturing would be somewhat difficult due to the high tolerances needed to allow the parts to rotate, without spinning too freely which would release the board prematurely. Three main designs were created which included the rotating tabs, extending tabs, and extending dowels.

Summary of Results

Each of the concepts has pro’s and cons involved with it. Each require additional refining to be even considered a feasible solution.

Lessons Learned

The product needs to be easily manufactured and therefore easily repaired. It must be able to work quickly even when it’s packed full of ice. This probably will not happen if the ice gets into the disk where the mechanism for the extending tabs and dowels is. The device needs to either be in the open where the ice can break off it, or totally and absolutely sealed off from any leakage of water into the system. If ice were to melt and get into the system while the boarder is in the sun, then freeze later, it could not only make the release defective, but also damage the equipment as the water expands to ice.

← Back to ERSB Main PageJason Wendel Report HomeNext to Problem Statement →
Page last modified on December 03, 2006, at 09:39 AM
  1. SearchWiki
  2. Recent Changes
  3. All Recent Changes
  4. WikiHelp
  5. Wiki Stats
  6.              
  7. Change Password
    1. ▲ Top ▲
    2. Edit:
    3. SideBar
    4. MenuBar
    5. BottomBar
    6. GroupHeader
    7. GroupFooter